Transparency
Editorial Policy
How this site produces what you are reading.
Articles on this site are AI-generated.
Every article is written by a language model from a named public source and is not reviewed by a human before publication. Treat it as a fast index into the primary source, not as an authoritative advisory. Verify anything operational against the vendor advisory, CISA, or NVD.
Who publishes this
RuntimeRebel is an automated cybersecurity intelligence project. Articles carry the byline Runtime Rebel Intel, which is the name of the automated desk — not a person. We use an organisation byline deliberately: attributing machine-generated analysis to an invented human would be a false authorship signal, and you deserve to know which you are reading.
How an article is produced
- Collection. A scheduled job polls the security sources listed below every four hours and picks up items it has not seen before.
- Generation. A language model rewrites the source item into a structured technical article: an executive briefing, technical analysis, and recommended mitigations. It is instructed to use only facts present in the source material and never to invent CVE identifiers, CVSS scores, or attribution.
- Automated quality gates. Articles are rejected and regenerated if they fall below a minimum length, omit section structure, carry a malformed meta description, or contain any phrase on our banned-cliché list. Severity and category values are constrained to a fixed vocabulary, and tags are folded onto a canonical taxonomy.
- Publication. The article is committed with a link back to the primary source, which appears at the top of every article page.
Sources
We aggregate from 12 public security feeds. We do not have privileged access to any of them, and we do not conduct original research or malware analysis — credit for the underlying reporting belongs to these publishers:
- The Hacker News
- BleepingComputer
- SecurityWeek
- Krebs on Security
- Dark Reading
- Schneier on Security
- CISA Cybersecurity Advisories
- CrowdStrike Blog
- Google Cloud / Mandiant Threat Intelligence
- SANS Internet Storm Center
- Google Project Zero
- Recorded Future
What we do not do
- We do not claim original reporting. Every article points at its source.
- We do not publish exploit code or weaponised proof-of-concept material.
- We do not let sponsorship influence coverage. Sponsored articles are labelled Sponsored; see the Terms of Use.
Known limitations
Language models can misread nuance, over-state confidence, or conflate similar vulnerabilities. Severity ratings are the model's assessment against a published rubric, not a vendor CVSS score unless one is explicitly cited. Where an article and its primary source disagree, the primary source is correct.
Corrections
If you find an inaccuracy, email corrections@runtimerebel.com with the article URL and what is wrong. We correct or unpublish demonstrably inaccurate articles. Security researchers and vendors who want a mischaracterisation of their product or disclosure fixed will be prioritised.
For anything else, see Contact.